tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post5254752007710449434..comments2023-04-24T07:39:26.003-07:00Comments on Be The Revolution: The Man is the Head...Until the Marriage Vows?Davidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14670609970252209273noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-89411655343650521182008-02-03T22:58:00.000-08:002008-02-03T22:58:00.000-08:00David,Well thanks for stumbling on my blog. :-)Th...David,<BR/>Well thanks for stumbling on my blog. :-)<BR/>This post is a specific reference to an argument made on another site. So yes, I agree that there are some holes in this post and argument... but it was not meant to defend egalitarianism in an exhaustive sense.<BR/>I've heard your position before. In fact, I've believed your position before, and with all due respect, I still disagree Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14670609970252209273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-34356910315102485972008-02-02T12:26:00.000-08:002008-02-02T12:26:00.000-08:00Hi David--just happened to come accross your blog....Hi David--just happened to come accross your blog. I'm not persuaded by your concerns. First, complementarians don't assume that husbands are perfect the way Jesus is--I'm not sure where you got that from. That's certainly a difference between Jesus and husbands, but it doesn't invalidate the line of argument in I Cor 11. Second, I don't understand your second concern. You say at first that it's David Talcotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04222635028681706376noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-51202393310015948702008-01-31T20:10:00.000-08:002008-01-31T20:10:00.000-08:00Thanks!Thanks!Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14670609970252209273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-52504749866614270012008-01-31T17:22:00.000-08:002008-01-31T17:22:00.000-08:00Thanks David. Your post really says it well.Thanks David. Your post really says it well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-63160534112971746702008-01-30T17:25:00.000-08:002008-01-30T17:25:00.000-08:00good post bro, sounds like there's some confusion ...good post bro, sounds like there's some confusion between the economic nature of the trinity (what they do) and the relational (who they are) going on. If you base it on what they do then you end up wirh father sending the son and hence all the talk of the husband being charge of the wife - the direction only flows one way.<BR/><BR/>but if what they do flows out of who they are - in other words Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15634161472310018109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-33370422384134990632008-01-30T15:43:00.000-08:002008-01-30T15:43:00.000-08:00thanks don!thanks don!Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14670609970252209273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-91485864375400599542008-01-30T09:08:00.000-08:002008-01-30T09:08:00.000-08:00I too am of the egalitarian school of thought and ...I too am of the egalitarian school of thought and love the way you look at the whole of scripture. Peace to you.Friar Don Pratthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02747935344273355462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-6217539474026309882008-01-28T19:03:00.000-08:002008-01-28T19:03:00.000-08:00A church I went to in Omaha whilst in college had ...A church I went to in Omaha whilst in college had a slogan...<BR/>"The Whole Bible, For Whole People, For The Whole World."<BR/><BR/>Seems appropriate to remember that on occasion.Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14670609970252209273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-79733870331541387142008-01-28T09:08:00.000-08:002008-01-28T09:08:00.000-08:00I've often asked complementarians if they are will...I've often asked complementarians if they are willing to die for their wives. The conversation is what usually dies at that point. Christ died for the church, but most men are not quite as willing to die for their wives. Submission is wonderful when one is the submittor, but when the shoe goes on the other foot ... it gets a little more dicey. <BR/><BR/>You make an excellent point ... thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-59616262200779149032008-01-28T08:22:00.000-08:002008-01-28T08:22:00.000-08:00The trinity doesn't contain the church; the exampl...The trinity doesn't contain the church; the example of the relationship between God and the church is found when Abraham sends his eldest servant (Eliezer, who's name means comforter, councilor), to find a wife for Isaac. Abraham/Eleizer/Isaac are a <I>type</I>, and portray the nature of the triune God. Rebekah (the church) is to be married to Isaac (the son), at the calling of Eliezer (the jovial_cynichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16379639191466236692noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37839424.post-26524538349595513042008-01-27T20:42:00.000-08:002008-01-27T20:42:00.000-08:00excellent post! I am a regular reader of your wife...excellent post! I am a regular reader of your wife's blog, I'll have to start coming over this way more often. I really favor the egalitarian model of marriage and church, it makes the most sense when you look at the bible as a whole.Tia Lynnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08131181929874342944noreply@blogger.com